The Good
The first characteristic
that I cherished in my group was our ability to work independently on the tasks
allocated. The team consisted of members from different faculties and ages,
meaning that face-to-face meetings were difficult. Given the short span of
time, tasks would have to be allocated to each member and everyone would need
to have the responsibility to complete them before the agreed deadline. Although
task allocation was an issue in the beginning, I was fortunate that every group
member eventually worked with much efficiency and completed the tasks expected
of them.
In the workplace, scheduling
meetings would probably also be an issue as well and thus, every member would
need to undertake the responsibility of carrying out his or her work
independently within the agreed deadline. Hence, working independently and
taking responsibility are key traits required in working well in teams, be it
in the module or in the workplace.
In addition, I realized that even
if the team members have to work independently, there is a need to be open to
opinions and feedback. My group was rather slow in the beginning due to the
need to change our project idea and the time we took to get to work.
Thankfully, when this issue was brought up by one of us, the team took this as
constructive feedback and improved our way of task assignment rather quickly.
The need for open feedback
channels was also important when evaluating the product as a group. This not
only keeps other group members up-to-date on one another’s progress, but also
allows for standardization and improvement on the product based on the other
members’ feedback. This becomes especially critical when the person is
experiencing difficulties in handling his/her work, something which would commonly
occur in the workplace. Hence, being open and responsive to feedback is
essential in group work.
Some possible improvements
As mentioned earlier on, the group experienced difficulties
in initiating work during the earlier weeks of the project commencement. I
personally felt that this could be due to the lack of specificity in tasks
assigned to each of us. While all of us were given a particular role, this may
be too vague and even overwhelming for one to handle, especially under time
constraints. Members may not be able to break the bigger task into smaller bits
and work on these bits step-by-step, hence leading to delay. In addition, while
the general deadlines and expectations were discussed in the first meeting, it
was not followed closely as we soon disregarded the document. This may have
also caused the delay in work progress.
Thus, it may have been better to have someone to keep track
of deadlines and expectations closely and update everyone on the progress made.
Tasks assigned should also be given in smaller bits and with agreed deadlines.
Thus, the first meeting is very important in establishing the efficiency of the
team, where specificity of roles and expectations must be clear and constantly
reiterated to the team.
Lastly, teamwork would need open communication channels and
honesty. Although each of us had to work independently, there is a need to
update the rest of one’s progress and difficulties faced. As one would have
many other assignments to do, it is natural for someone to have a period of
time where he or she is less able to contribute to the project. This should
however be communicated clearly with reasons to prevent possible
misunderstandings and tension within the group.
Keeping feedback channels open at all stages is critical to
allow every group member to understand the current progress of the group. It
would also to enhance the spirit of teamwork by sharing one’s opinions,
expertise and assistance to one another. One room for improvement for my group was the
lack of feedback channels of each other’s work during the earlier stages. While
this may be difficult in the hectic workplace (where efficiency is valued), I
feel that this is a critical element in understanding one another’s work ethics
and thus, ease the transition in working as a team.
Overall, I feel that responsibility, honesty and openness-cum-responsiveness
to feedback are important traits to have in team-based projects. Open
communication channels and specificity in tasks allocated are key elements in
increasing the efficiency of the team while allowing for understanding between
team members.
Hi Claudia
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that being responsive to feedback is essential in group work because only then we can learn from one another and make improvements to our proposal. I felt that delay in work progress is a very common problem for group work as people place their priorities in completing their task differently. Such problems can be dealt with by updating teammates about your schedule and adjusting the project timeline accordingly.
Your post has explained very clearly the group dynamics within your team and has provided readers with useful takeaways for teamwork at the workplace. Good job!